Message posted by Ty (Member since 02/04/2022) on July 28, 2023 at 12:57:01 PST:
true, but if Burchett et al don't get the authority, it's a dead-end conversation. and to get read in, they'll have to agree not to divulge what they hear publicly. I do respect following procedure and the oath to keep classified info classified... ...but to play devil's advocate, then you end up with a Lou Elizondo situation, in which all you say is that you cannot say because it is classified...it has practically become Lou's gimmick to talk about the things he cannot talk about...it's literally a meme now ...and since we're dealing with things that are classified within classified within classified, it inherently cannot become public knowledge ever because that would require someone to break the chain and violate the classification procedures. otherwise, it's just an unending pointless circle. so most of these routes still just put us back where we started: no disclosure because "it's classified."
In Reply to: Re: Congressional UAP Briefing posted by The Doctor on July 28, 2023 at 10:14:22 PST:
Replies: