Message posted by RoadKill on October 13, 2010 at 9:18:48 PST:
The more evasive you are on providing specifics, the more it seems like the story is false. Vague references to "links to additional photos, the EXIF data, and a video" don't bolster your case - they actually raise more questions. Provide the links! Provide the EXIF data! Link to the video! I understand that some folks don't want their name spread all over the internet. But, without some corroborating information (like proof of the date, another source coming forward, etc.), your photo is just another photo of a retired airframe: And not a particularly good one at that. Take a step back and just think about something you've seen on the internet that you don't believe. You probably see at least one per day. With this new perspective, think of how you'd like to be convicnced that some questionable (very reasonably questioned here) photo is actually true. You would not take the word of someone who presents it as a photo "a friend took". Without proof, it might as well be a photo of Bigfoot or the like. Not picking on you...but you've got to understand why your photo cannot be accepted just on face value. RoadKill
In Reply to: Re: F-117s posted by Robert on October 13, 2010 at 8:24:27 PST:
Replies: