Message posted by werD on May 20, 2006 at 10:21:22 PST:

Probably a hoax? The noise on the image looks incredibly added. I've never seen a digital image look that way, unless the noise was added. Do you have anything higher resolution? An analysis of the histogram for the image insists that the brighter parts of the image were added in and blended--although the reality is with an image this small and this noisy, it could be anything fact or fiction. But more towards the side of fiction than anything else. What did you use to get such a tiny, high-noise image?

In Reply to: Re: fingers crossed posted by Alex (UK) on May 19, 2006 at 16:15:31 PST:

Replies:

• Re: fingers crossed Alex (UK) 05/20/2006, 14:20:56 PST (7)
  • Re: fingers crossed werD 05/20/2006, 16:40:36 PST (6)
    • Re: fingers crossed Alex (UK) 05/21/2006, 5:11:38 PST (5)
      • Re: fingers crossed Lumpy 05/21/2006, 21:55:41 PST (4)
        • Re: fingers crossed Alex (UK) 05/22/2006, 12:52:03 PST (2)
          • Re: fingers crossed Francois 05/23/2006, 10:46:11 PST (1)
            • Re: fingers crossed Alex (UK) 05/25/2006, 4:22:47 PST (0)
        • Re: fingers crossed Alex (UK) 05/22/2006, 12:03:42 PST (0)